A shared assessment standard
We turn selected call criteria into questions that can be checked, using clear, problematic and ambiguous examples.
We connect your call criteria with the relevant parts of each conversation. Your team leader gets a review they can verify and decides what belongs in feedback and training.
Project offer · Scope and implementation are agreed for your operation.
Compare the criterion with its conversation excerpt.
Review follow-up questions for relevance and completeness.
Check that responsibility and follow-up are clear.
An overall score says little about where a request remained unclear or a next step was missed. Managers spend time finding useful examples and debate ratings without a shared basis.
Compare the criterion with its conversation excerpt.
Review follow-up questions for relevance and completeness.
Check that responsibility and follow-up are clear.
We turn selected call criteria into questions that can be checked, using clear, problematic and ambiguous examples.
Each finding points to the relevant excerpt. Missing or uncertain evidence is explicitly flagged.
The team leader confirms or corrects the assessment and selects specific topics for feedback and training.
The team lead approves sample conversations and three professional criteria for the test.
The review matches relevant statements to the criteria and presents traceable findings.
The team lead compares each finding with its evidence, confirms it or records a correction.
Confirmed findings become a short list of specific improvements. The lead also assesses whether the review meaningfully supports their work.
One team, an approved selection of conversations and three agreed criteria. The test supports professional feedback; it makes no automatic employment decisions.
We measure the time spent finding, listening to and professionally assessing a relevant conversation point.
System findings are compared with manual control assessments, with reasons recorded for differences.
The lead labels accepted, corrected and unsupported findings and their relevance to call feedback.
Useful feedback needs the specific issue and supporting evidence. We therefore work with individual criteria and the associated conversation excerpts.
The reviewer can correct it and record the reason. These differences count in the pilot assessment and show where criteria or analysis need adjustment.
No. We start with an approved sample from one team. Professional review of that sample informs whether a broader scope is useful.
We set up a pilot for your rental or service operation: voice AI captures the request, site and required details, then hands them to your team in a structured form. Together, we test one defined workflow from the call to an accepted request.
See the workflow & deliverables ↗We design an order workflow with clear responsibilities, documents and approvals. We assess your existing systems and offer B2B-System as an adaptable option for a limited pilot.
See the workflow & deliverables ↗Tell us about a process that takes up your team’s time. We discuss where automation could help and what is needed to define the next step.
Describe your current workflow, the people involved and the outcome you need.
HEINRICH SCHNEIDER / DDC
heinrich@ddc.companyPrefer email? Write to us directly.